What if Britain never conquered India?

What if British still ruled India?

If India was still being ruled by the Britishers, there would have surely been much better infrastructure but it was possible that most of the Indians would have either died in the wars of other countries or would have continued to be slaves of the Britishers living in India.

Do British still have control over India?

British raj, period of direct British rule over the Indian subcontinent from 1858 until the independence of India and Pakistan in 1947.

Which Indian state was never ruled by the British?

India had 565 princely states during the year 1947. These were ruled by native rulers and not the British. The present states of Telangana, Goa, Jammu, and Kashmir, Sikkim, and Rajasthan were never under the British rule in India.

Was India rich before British rule?

From 1 century CE till the start of British colonisation in India in 17th century, India’s GDP always varied between ~25 – 35% world’s total GDP, which dropped to 2% by Independence of India in 1947. At the same time, the Britain’s share of the world economy rose from 2.9% in 1700 up to 9% in 1870 alone.

THIS IS FUN:  What it was like to live in London in the Middle Ages?

Why did Britishers leave India?

Due to the Naval Mutiny, Britain decided to leave India in a hurry because they were afraid that if the mutiny spread to the army and police, there would be large scale killing of Britishers all over India. Hence Britain decided to transfer power at the earliest.

How did British exploit India?

The British East India Company made its sneaky entry through the Indian port of Surat in 1608. … After the Indian Sepoy Mutiny of 1857, the British government assumed full control, dissolving the trading company. Imperial rule destroyed India’s local hand loom industry to fund its own industrialization.

What bad things did the British do to India?

Up to 35 million died unnecessarily in famines; London ate India’s bread while India starved, and in 1943 nearly four million Bengalis died. It was their own fault, according to the odious Churchill, for “breeding like rabbits”. Collectively, these famines amounted to a “British colonial holocaust”.

Was British rule good or bad for India?

Some recent research suggests that British rule did little for India in economic terms. Britain gained hugely from ruling India, but most of the wealth created was not invested back into the country. … India’s population only grew by about 1% per year, which also suggests there was not much economic growth.

Which country ruled India first?

The British Raj (/rɑːdʒ/; from Hindi rāj, means state or government) was the rule of the British Crown on the Indian subcontinent from 1858 to 1947. The rule is also called Crown rule in India, or direct rule in India.

British Raj.

THIS IS FUN:  Your question: What was Scotland called in the 13th century?
India
Viceroy
• 1858–1862 (first) Charles Canning
• 1947 (last) Louis Mountbatten
Secretary of State