What were the differences between the English and French colonies of North America?
How were the Dutch and French colonies different from the Enflish colonies in North America? THe English colonies were more populated; while the Dutch and French colonies were established mainly for commerical reasons, New England was begun for religious reasons.
How did French and British imperialism differ?
The British overall were distant from local people, viewing colonial populations as essentially different from European populations. By comparison, the French imperialists gave lip service to the view that colonial populations could become French citizens if they assimilated.
How was French colonization similar to Spanish and English colonization in America?
The major similarity between French and Spanish colonies in the Americas is that both were what one textbook I teach from calls “frontiers of inclusion.” In both of these countries’ colonies, Native Americans were made an integral part of society. In both countries’ colonies, then, Native Americans were very important.
What was the key difference between British rule and French rule?
According to this view, French colonial administration was very centralized and based on assimilation of colonial territories with France, while British colonial administration was much more decentralized, based upon cooperation with local chiefs.
How were the French and British colonies similar?
There are similarities between the French and British plans for colonization. One similarity is that both countries had a need to expand beyond their borders. … Additionally, by establishing colonies, both countries could get natural resources that would help their industries.
What was the difference between French and English settlements quizlet?
What was the basic difference between french and English attitudes about the land they acquired in north america? The French came to be fur traders and travel and work with the Indians. The British came to farm to give anal to native Indians.
What was different between the French and the British in colonial leadership Select all that are true?
They sent students to study abroad. What was different between the French and the British in colonial leadership? … The British relied on native princes and local troops to maintain control. The French sent French colonial governors to maintain control.
What were the major differences between British French and Spanish colonies?
One major difference between the two is that the Spanish colonies were much more intensively settled and a much more developed economy was created there than in French colonies. French colonies were sparsely settled and were used mainly as ways to trade with the Indians for furs.
Why were the English colonies more successful than the Spanish and French?
The British were ultimately more successful than the Dutch and French in colonizing North America because of sheer numbers. From the start, the British came to the continent with the intent of settling it. … The rulers back in Europe actually made it very difficult for French and Dutch settlers to obtain and manage land.
How did the development of the Spanish and French colonies in the late 17th century differ from that of the English colonies?
How did the development of the Spanish and French colonies in the late seventeenth century differ from that of the English colonies? The French were developing small trading colonies and Spain had a very fragile empire at this time. While the English were developing a strong empire of ever growing states.